stock phrases and conscious writing

Posted on December 20th, 2006 by Scraps.
Categories: Words, Editing.

A former systems administrator for the nation's largest pharmacy benefits manager (says the New York Times) has been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly planting a "logic bomb" that could have erased critical prescription information for 60 million Americans, including the information that tracks whether an individual is being prescribed dangerous combinations. Awful, but not what I came here to write about.

"The potential damage to Medco and the patients and physicians served by the company cannot be understated," Christopher J. Christie, the United States attorney for New Jersey, said in a statement.

(I'm glad he said it in a statement and not an interpretive dance or something.) Mr. Christie is saying the exact opposite of what he means. He means to say either that it cannot be overstated or that it should not be understated. This is one of the biggest dangers of stock phrases: the writer rarely thinks about what the words actually say. Stock phrases are generic signifiers. Mr. Christie wants to communicate a broad feeling of importance, and has reached into a bag of phrases and plugged one in that felt right. A large proportion of our speech operates this way, and no doubt everyone knows what Mr. Christie means, and probably only a few people will experience even a little bump at the wrong choice: the listener/reader is already anticipating the shape of the meaning from the context.

4 comments.

Kathy Walton

Comment on December 20th, 2006.

Statement meaning it was something that was distributed and was not said in a one-on-one interview with the reporter.

And, yes, I know what you mean about stock phrases. Both "decimate" and "begs the question" have become stock phrases and, when used, are used erroneously. I've given up on "decimate", but I'm still hanging in there with "begs the question". http://begthequestion.info/ Yes, I sometimes fight losing battles. *sigh*

Scraps

Comment on December 20th, 2006.

I was just tweaking them about "statement"; it bugs me a little that the media now use "statement" to mean "printed statement", but it is a widely understood convention.

Decimate doesn't bother me, because many of the words used to mean large general effects once meant something more specific, or something entirely different, and because there are in fact very few uses for "decimate" as a strictly observed word. "Beg the question", though, makes me wince every time, because it means something completely unrelated and specifically useful. And because misused phrases always annoy me more than misused words. Phrases are bigger building blocks of thought, and misusing them messes things up more.

Sarah

Comment on December 21st, 2006.

May I add "I could care less" to the list? That one drives me nuts.

I'd support more interpretive dance-based press releases, though.

Scraps

Comment on December 21st, 2006.

Yeah, although "I could care less" is so firmly ensconced (stock phrase alert!) as a substitute for "I couldn't care less" that we might as well just assume it's shorthand for "I could care less, but not much."

Idiom is a funny area. Lots of idiom violates rationality in some way, but it makes the language more colorful. If I were inclined to be difficult, I'd point out that it doesn't actually literally drive you nuts, and for that matter what the person says is literally true: they probably could care less. And we object to the phrase because it mangles an idiom that is literally false.

More insidious to me are colorless phrases that have through repetition become automatic verbal blocks on their own. Most attentive readers have some reaction to "I could care less", whether annoyed or not, that recognizes the potential problems with the phrase. But we skim right over language like, oh, for example, "our future depends upon" (just choosing one at random) -- the kind of phrase that indicates an intended rhetorical effect more than it does a thought.

Leave a comment

Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are appreciated but not required (emails aren't displayed).

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image