watsoning

Posted on February 6th, 2007 by Scraps.
Categories: Words, Books.

I know a few people here have read Barry Hughart's Bridge of Birds, with varying reactions (hi Gavin, Ellie, Debbie). It won a World Fantasy Award when it was originally published (in the late 70s, I think), so it's not exactly obscure; but Hughart's career never progressed beyond that success, and these days I rarely hear it mentioned. It is in print (in mass market paperback).

So many modern fantasies are bloated epics. Bridge of Birds is the opposite: a compact, self-contained, perfect little gem, like Peter S. Beagle's The Last Unicorn, Ellen Kushner's Swordspoint, Pamela Dean's The Dubious Hills, Thorne Smith's Night Life of the Gods. (Sorry, lists always start to get out of hand with me.)

Bridge of Birds has a farcical comic tone and plot, but begins with tragedy and ends with sublime transendence, and somehow makes the whole mix work. When I was reading it to Velma a few years ago, she discovered that Hughart allowed the first draft to be published on the web. I don't recommend it unless you've read the book; for one thing, the farcical tone of the book is not under control in this early draft. It's far cruder and louder and not really funny. But if you've read the book, it's fascinating to see that it grew from this. There are plot elements that never made it into Bridge of Birds that turn up in the two (sadly inferior*) sequels.

More importantly, Hughart clearly made a huge jump in his writing between this draft and the final version, and the heart of the book was completely reconstructed. In the first draft, the narrator and hero is the brilliant Li Kao, who is 19 years old, while Number Ten Ox is an incidental character, the village idiot. In the final version, Li Kao is still brilliant, still the focus of the book, but he is ancient; Number Ten Ox is the narrator, a humble young man of virtue and strength and unextraordinary brain, and the perfect Watson for Li Kao. This change, I think, allowed the book to happen as it did: a character like Li Kao needs to be presented from outside, like Jeeves.

* The first time I wrote about this, I got a comment from someone who read one of the sequels first, and prefers it to the first book. So maybe it's just the order one reads them in. It's hard for me to credit, though.

5 comments.

Ellie

Comment on February 6th, 2007.

Oh, what a lovely book, and one that merits re-reading. Hed Impact continues it was on the list to be published in that program.

(BTW, Night Life of the Gods is one of the funniest things ever written. Ever. People who haven't read it whould do so, right away.)

nezua limón xolagrafik-jonez

Comment on February 6th, 2007.

I make such HUGE changes from draft to draft, in terms of style, finesse, complexity of symbols, and even sometimes, in plot—that it kills me to think of anyone reading anything but that which I decide is the finished product!

Scraps

Comment on February 7th, 2007.

I don't think I could let any old drafts into the world, I cringe enough already at some of the things I decided were finished!

Dan Blum

Comment on February 8th, 2007.

Bridge of Birds was published in 1984, and won the World Fantasy Award in 1985 (tying with Mythago Wood, if memory serves).

It is a brilliant book, and the only one which I ever, upon finishing, turned back to the beginning and started over, because I wasn't ready to stop reading it yet.

I definitely agree that the sequels are not as good, although I still enjoy them. Part of my problem with them is that Hughart uses the same damn plot twist in each, and it gets tiresome. The other part is that he starts borrowing elements from more abstruse areas of Chinese legend and literature, and doesn't handle them well - in Bridge of Birds he uses fairly simple, effective things, but in The Story of the Stone he's got the whole energy-flow thing which he fails to make compelling, and in Eight Skilled Gentlemen he can only make all the stuff he borrowed from the Book of Songs fit together by inventing a whole mystic tradition, and unfortunately he doesn't do a great job of it.

Given all this I am less sad than I might be that he never published his fourth book (Dancing Girl), although I think given a good editor - and Hughart's willingness to listen to such - he could produce another really good book.

Scraps

Comment on February 10th, 2007.

I didn't know that background on the sequels; thank you! I didn't know there was an unpublished fourth book, either.

Leave a comment

Comments can contain some xhtml. Names and emails are appreciated but not required (emails aren't displayed).

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image